Unique Sports Products, Inc. v. Yonex Corporation
| Unique Sports Products, Inc. |
| Yonex Corporation |
| 1:2023cv00590 |
| February 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Yonex Corporation Answer due 5/2/2023. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 4/3/2023. (tmf)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with Brief In Support by Unique Sports Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Creasman, W.) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Yonex Corporation Answer due 4/2/2023. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 2/28/2023. (dob)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with Brief In Support by Unique Sports Products, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Creasman, W.) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 2/14/2023. (dob)
|
| Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Unique Sports Products, Inc.. Yonex Corporation served on 2/10/2023, answer due 3/3/2023. (Creasman, W.) |
| Clerks Notation re #2 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosure Statement Reviewed by March H. Cohen. (lme) |
| Notice of deficiency re AO Form 120. Plaintiff must complete and file AO Form 120. See LR 3.4 and LPR 1.4. Docket the form using the event AO 120, located in the Other Filings/Other Documents menu. (jra) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Yonex Corporation. (jra) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Unique Sports Products, Inc. (jra) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Unique Sports Products, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12375073) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Unique Sports Products, Inc. v. Yonex Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Unique Sports Products, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Falkner Nelson Werkhaven |
| Represented By: | W. Scott Creasman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Yonex Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
