Blount v. Smith et al
| Ericka Blount |
| Nikki Smith, Mulanta Clark-Wilkins, Natasha Woody, Atlanta Board of Education and Atlanta Public Schools |
| 1:2023cv00644 |
| February 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Victoria M Calvert |
| Regina D Cannon |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brandon O. Moulard on behalf of Atlanta Board of Education, Atlanta Public Schools, Mulanta Clark-Wilkins, Natasha Woody (Moulard, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Summons Issued as to Natasha Woody. (lwb) |
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Mulanta Clark-Wilkins. (lwb) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Nikki Smith. (lwb) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Atlanta Board of Education. (lwb) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Atlanta Public Schools. (lwb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Ericka Blount. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12382290) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
