Overture Buckhead South v. Davis
Overture Buckhead South doing business as Overture Buckhead South |
James Davis |
1:2023cv00736 |
February 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
William M Ray |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Electronic Transmittal of Certified copy of #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation to the Fulton County Magistrate Court. (tas) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James Davis re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (tas) |
Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING #3 Final Report and Recommendation as the Opinion of this Court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that this action is REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Fulton County, Georgia. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. Signed by Judge William M. Ray, II on 3/22/2023. (tas) |
Civil Case Terminated. (tas) |
Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal, filed by James Davis, to District Judge William M. Ray II. (sll) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Order ruling on IFP, Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 2/22/2023. (tas) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis for the purpose of REMAND, FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal, that this action be REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Fulton County. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the reference of this matter to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 2/22/2023. (tas) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by James Davis. (tas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to James Davis re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal, filed by James Davis. (tas) |
Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (pdt) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Davis. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(pdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Overture Buckhead South v. Davis | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Overture Buckhead South doing business as Overture Buckhead South | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: James Davis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.