Reaves v. Lee et al
| Kathy Reaves |
| Dwanye Lee, John Melvin, Michael Daniel Hucko, Cordero Foster, Patrick Dean Blanchard, Officer Sutton, Richmond County Sheriff Office, County of Richmond and Georgia Power-Southern Company |
| 1:2023cv00778 |
| February 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Kathy Reaves. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jra) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 7
ORDER: In accordance with the foregoing, Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis in Case No. 1:23-cv-00778, ECF No. #1 , is GRANTED; Plaintiff's motion for extension of time, Reaves, No. 1:23-cv-00778, ECF No. #5 , is GRANTED; and Plaintiff is GRANTED leave through Thursday, April 20, 2023, to file appropriate responses in Case Nos. 1:22-cv-04764-LMM-JEM, 1:23-cv-00778-LMM, and 1:23-cv-01082-LMM. The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit all three cases to the undersigned for further consideration on April 25, 2023. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 3/20/23. (jra)
|
|
ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis #1 . Ruled on by Judge Leigh Martin May on 3/20/2023 in #7 ORDER. (jra)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Kathy Reaves re #7 Order. (jra) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE re #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION filed by Kathy Reaves. (jra) |
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kathy Reaves, #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to respond to the Order and Recommendation, to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
| Filing 5 Motion for Extension of Time To Respond To #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Kathy Reaves. (jra) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 2/23/23. (jra)
|
|
Filing 3
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff's IFP application #1 be DENIED, and that Plaintiff be ordered to consolidate all of her claims into NDGA Case No. 1:22-CV-04764-LMM-JEM. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 2/23/23. (jra)
|
|
Filing 2
---DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR--- - ORDER: The Court RECOMMENDS that Plaintiffs IFP application #1 be DENIED and that Plaintiff be ordered to consolidate all of her claims into NDGA Case No. 1:22-CV-04764-LMM-JEM. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 2/23/2023. (jra)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Kathy Reaves re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Kathy Reaves. (jra) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (pdt) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kathy Reaves. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(pdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
