Kessel v. M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.
| Andrea Kessel |
| M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. and Drexel Shingles |
| 1:2023cv00969 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Regina D Cannon |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER GRANTING #14 Joint Motion for Extension of Time. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's #11 amended complaint no later than May 19, 2023. The parties shall complete their early planning conference and file the Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan no later than May 31, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 5/3/2023. (ane)
|
| Filing 15 Return of Service Executed by Andrea Kessel. Drexel Shingles served on 5/2/2023, answer due 5/23/2023. (Sutherland, Brian) |
| Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time To File Amended Answer and Submit Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan by Andrea Kessel. (Sutherland, Brian) |
| Filing 13 Electronic Summons Issued as to Drexel Shingles. (tht) |
| Filing 12 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Andrea Kessel (Sutherland, Brian) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand filed by Andrea Kessel.(Sutherland, Brian) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons by Andrea Kessel. (Benjamin, Rachel) |
| Filing 9 Guidelines for Discovery and Motion Practice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 4/3/23. (ceo) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: Counsel for Plaintiff is ORDERED to file the required CIP on or before April 10, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 4/3/23. (ceo)
|
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. for M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.. (Midence, Adriana) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.. Discovery ends on 8/28/2023.(Midence, Adriana) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Andrea Kessel. M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. served on 3/10/2023, answer due 3/31/2023. (Sutherland, Brian) Modified on 3/24/2023 to correct docket entry (adg). |
| Refund in the amount of $402.00 has been processed, effective 3/14/2023 in response to Clerks Action on Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (kns) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc. (aaq) |
| Clerks Approval re #3 Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (mec) |
| Filing 3 Application for Refund of Fees paid online through Pay.gov for receipt number AGANDC 12438772. (Sutherland, Brian) |
| Filing 2 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Andrea Kessel (Sutherland, Brian) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Andrea Kessel (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12438772) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
