Williams v. Labat et al
| Anthony E. Williams |
| Sheriff Patrick Labat, Fulton County Jail, Atlanta Police Department and Officer Jordan Tate |
| 1:2023cv01032 |
| March 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Charles A Pannell |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Anthony E. Williams re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #6 Clerk's Judgment. Re: Released; Return to Sender. (pdt) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing this action without prejudice (ceo)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Anthony E. Williams re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #6 Clerk's Judgment. (ceo) |
Filing 5
ORDER: The court ADOPTS the #3 R&R as the order and opinion of this court. The clerk is DIRECTED to terminate this civil action. Signed by Judge Charles A. Pannell, Jr. on 4/6/23. (ceo)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (ceo) |
| Submission of #3 Final Report and Recommendation to District Judge Charles A. Pannell Jr. (bnw) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Anthony E. Williams re #3 Final Report and Recommendation, Order ruling on IFP, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (rsg) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation, Order ruling on IFP, by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 03/17/2023. (rsg)
|
|
Filing 3
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, recommending that this civil action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A because it appears that the Anthony E. Williams, the prisoner-plaintiff who filed it, failed to disclose his prior litigation history. I DENY WITHOUT PREJUDICE Williams' application for permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) because it makes self-contradictory claims and omits statutorily required signatures and attachments. If Williams objects to this Final Report and Recommendation, I ORDER him to include with his Objections either (1) payment of the $402 due in case initiation fees or (2) a complete IFP application with all required information, signatures, certifications, and attachments. I caution Williams that failure to comply with this order may constitute an additional and independent basis for dismissal of this civil action. See LR 41.3(A)(2), NDGa. I DIRECT the Clerk to terminate the referral of this civil action to me. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 03/17/2023. (rsg)
|
| Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account for ifp and frivolity determination, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (tas) |
| Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Anthony E. Williams. (tas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Anthony E. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
