Jackson v. Brooks
Plaintiff: Damond Keith Jackson
Defendant: Michael Brooks
Case Number: 1:2023cv01317
Filed: March 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Victoria M Calvert
Referring Judge: Russell G Vineyard
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this action should not be DISMISSED for failure to comply with the Court's Order and for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) by filing a written response with the Clerk of Court within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order. Plaintiff also shall supplement his complaint and either pay the fee or submit a properly completed financial affidavit as previously ordered within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the undersigned Magistrate Judge twenty-four (24) days from the entry date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on this 19th day of May, 2023. (pdt)
May 19, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Damond Keith Jackson re #4 Order to Show Cause. (pdt)
April 3, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Damond Keith Jackson re #3 Order. Form sent: an affidavit and authorization for withdrawal from inmate account with the proper case caption affixed thereto. (lwb)
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER to Plaintiff to supplement his complaint by filing a brief written response with the Clerk of Court within THIRTY (30) DAYS of entry of this Order that identifies all the charges on which Officer Michael Brooks arrested plaintiff on 5/13/2017, and whether he has been arraigned on those charges, and if so, when. Plaintiff must state whether those charges remain pending or have been resolved. If any of the charges have been resolved, plaintiff must state when and how they were resolved. Further ORDERED that plaintiff must either pay the full filing fee of $402 or submit a financial affidavit seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on March 31, 2023. (lwb)
March 30, 2023 Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for IFP and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (pdt)
March 27, 2023 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Damond Keith Jackson. (pdt)
March 27, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Damond Keith Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Damond Keith Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?