Jackson v. Brooks
Damond Keith Jackson |
Michael Brooks |
1:2023cv01317 |
March 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Victoria M Calvert |
Russell G Vineyard |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this action should not be DISMISSED for failure to comply with the Court's Order and for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) by filing a written response with the Clerk of Court within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order. Plaintiff also shall supplement his complaint and either pay the fee or submit a properly completed financial affidavit as previously ordered within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the undersigned Magistrate Judge twenty-four (24) days from the entry date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on this 19th day of May, 2023. (pdt) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Damond Keith Jackson re #4 Order to Show Cause. (pdt) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Damond Keith Jackson re #3 Order. Form sent: an affidavit and authorization for withdrawal from inmate account with the proper case caption affixed thereto. (lwb) |
Filing 3 ORDER to Plaintiff to supplement his complaint by filing a brief written response with the Clerk of Court within THIRTY (30) DAYS of entry of this Order that identifies all the charges on which Officer Michael Brooks arrested plaintiff on 5/13/2017, and whether he has been arraigned on those charges, and if so, when. Plaintiff must state whether those charges remain pending or have been resolved. If any of the charges have been resolved, plaintiff must state when and how they were resolved. Further ORDERED that plaintiff must either pay the full filing fee of $402 or submit a financial affidavit seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on March 31, 2023. (lwb) |
Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis for IFP and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (pdt) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Damond Keith Jackson. (pdt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Damond Keith Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jackson v. Brooks | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Damond Keith Jackson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael Brooks | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.