Patterson v. LM General Insurance Company
Rachel Patterson |
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and LM General Insurance Company |
1:2023cv01326 |
March 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Michael L Brown |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/26/2021. (jpk) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., Corporate Parent LM General Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc. for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (pdt) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Discovery ends on 8/28/2023.(pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-12492010) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.