Miller et al v. Ruff Leasing LLC et al
| Horace Miller and Zakiyyah Miller |
| Ruff Leasing LLC and Mei Lien Lai |
| 1:2023cv01393 |
| March 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Amy Totenberg |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER directing parties to file a Joint Preliminary Report and Discovery Plan no later than 6/6/2023. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 5/25/2023. (dob)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Compliance (Warshauer, Michael) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Compliance (Shuping, Trent) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED ORDER Joint Proposed Scheduling Order and Discovery Plan. (Kamensky, Lauren) |
|
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER: Guidelines to Parties and Counsel. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 4/7/2023. (dob)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Ruff Leasing LLC, and Mei Lien Lai. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-12500026) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
