Junco v. Ware State Prison et al
| Douglas Junco |
| Ware State Prison and Unit Manager Carver |
| 1:2023cv01483 |
| April 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Sarah E Geraghty |
| Linda T Walker |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case electronically transferred to the Southern District of Georgia. (ane) |
| New Civil Action Number in USDC SDGA 5:23-cv-0027(aar) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Douglas Junco re #2 Order. (ane) |
Filing 2
ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the Waycross Division of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia for all further proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 4/10/2023. (ane)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker terminated from case. (ane) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint for IFP and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (pdt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Douglas Junco. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
