Nelson et al v. Jaddou et al
| Rashawda S. Nelson and Shina A. Bolarinwa |
| Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Shineka Miller |
| 1:2023cv02512 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Sarah E Geraghty |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by Rashawda S. Nelson, Shina A. Bolarinwa. All Defendants. (Fogle, H.) |
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 6/12/2023. (sap)
|
| Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ryan K. Buchanan. (dnb) |
| Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Merrick B. Garland. (dnb) |
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Shineka Miller. (dnb) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (dnb) Modified document number on 6/5/2023 (dnb). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Rashawda S. Nelson, Shina A. Bolarinwa. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-12649752) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(dnb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. Modified document number on 6/5/2023 (dnb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
