Lewis v. United States of America
| Chaney Lewis |
| United States of America |
| 1:2023cv02637 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #6 MOTION of Violation of 13th Amendment to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (jpk) |
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (jpk) |
| Filing 6 MOTION of Violation of 13th Amendment by Chaney Lewis. (kng) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Of Filing Violation of Cruel and Unusual Punishment by Chaney Lewis. (kng) |
| Filing 4 OBJECTIONS to #2 Report and Recommendation filed by Chaney Lewis. (kng) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Chaney Lewis re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Chaney Lewis, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (kng) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 06/26/2023. (kng)
|
|
Filing 2
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that this civil action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE so that the plaintiff may refile his claims in the Southern District of Georgia re #1 Complaint. If the plaintiff objects to this Final Report and Recommendation, then I ORDER him to include with his Objections either payment of the $402 due in case initiation fees or a complete application for permission to proceed in forma pauperis, with all required information, signatures, certifications, and attachments. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the referral of this case to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 06/26/2023. c:Financial Office(kng)
|
| Submission of #1 Complaint for IFP and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (tht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Chaney Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chaney Lewis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
