AML, LLC Dayrise Residential v. Anderson
| AML, LLC Dayrise Residential |
| Tarhonda Anderson |
| 1:2023cv02641 |
| June 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Sarah E Geraghty |
| John K Larkins |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Remand Letter to Newton County Magistrate Court (ane) |
Filing 5
ORDER ADOPTING #3 Final Report and Recommendation. This case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Newton County, Georgia. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 7/13/2023. (ane)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (ane) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tarhonda Anderson re #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (ane) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Newton County Magistrate Court re #6 Remand Letter, #5 Order. (ane) |
| Submission of #3 Final Report and Recommendation to District Judge Sarah E. Geraghty. (sap) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 6/16/2023. (ane)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 Notice of Removal, filed by Tarhonda Anderson. The Court GRANTS the #1 application for leave to proceed IFP for the limited purpose of remand and RECOMMENDS that this case be REMANDED to the Magistrate Court of Newton County. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 6/16/2023. (ane)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Tarhonda Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ane) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Tarhonda Anderson re #3 Final Report and Recommendation, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (ane) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (dnb) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tarhonda Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(dnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AML, LLC Dayrise Residential v. Anderson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AML, LLC Dayrise Residential | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tarhonda Anderson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
