Butler v. Paranoia Quest et al
| Randy Butler, Jr. |
| Paranoia Quest, Dr. Joyce Mitchell, Jenee Jones, John Hill, Russell Johnson, Anthony Jackson, Anthony Butler, Ron Hall, Ronald Hill, Rubin Williams, Rubin Hamilton, Brian Ford, Brian Johnson and Dr. Joyce Jones |
| 1:2023cv03089 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Proposed Protective Order, by Randy Butler, Jr. (rsg) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE Of Filing Notice of Contest of Lien by Randy Butler, Jr. (rsg) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Discovery by Randy Butler, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rsg) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing this action. (rsg)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's IFP application and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's case under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Because Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. If the Plaintiff files such an amended complaint in the time allowed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to reopen the case and resubmit the matter to the Court for frivolity review. Given the dismissal of Plaintiff's case on frivolity review, the Court also DENIES AS MOOT Plaintiff's Motions for Discovery (Doc. Nos. #4 ; #5 ) and Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate Cases (Doc. No. #7 ). Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 8/25/2023. (rsg)
|
| Civil Case Terminated. (rsg) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Randy Butler, Jr. re #9 Clerk's Judgment, #8 Order on Motions. (rsg) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Randy Butler, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rsg) |
| Submission of #5 MOTION for Discovery, #4 MOTION for Discovery, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (pdw) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Of Filing Contact Update by Randy Butler, Jr. (rsg) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Discovery, requesting medical records by Randy Butler, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(rsg) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Discovery by Randy Butler, Jr.. (rsg) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by Randy Butler, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(rsg) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. I defer to the District Judge any determination as to whether the filing is frivolous, including whether this Court has subject matter jurisdiction, and ought to be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) along with any instructions to the parties regarding service and case management. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 7/13/2023. (rsg)
|
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (dnb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Randy Butler, Jr. re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (rsg) |
| Submission of #3 Complaint, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (rsg) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Randy Butler, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(dnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
