Batts v. Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC
Terry Batts |
Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC |
1:2023cv03096 |
July 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Regina D Cannon |
Steve C Jones |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Race Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING this action without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days to reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this action. If this matter is not reopened by the parties within sixty (60) days it will be deemed to have been dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 08/28/2023. (ddm) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Settlement by Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC (Stapleton, John) |
Civil Case Terminated. Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon terminated from case. (ddm) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Defendant Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC's Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs complaint on or before September 7, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 08/16/2023. (ddm) |
Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Stapleton, John) |
Filing 5 Return of Service Executed by Terry Batts. Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC served on 7/18/2023, answer due 8/8/2023. (Roberts, Victor) |
Refund in the amount of $402.00 has been processed, effective 8/3/2023 in response to Clerks Action on Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (kns) |
Clerks Approval re #4 Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (mec) |
Filing 4 Application for Refund of Fees paid online through Pay.gov for receipt number AGANDC-12725632. (Roberts, Victor) |
Filing 3 Application for Refund of Fees paid online through Pay.gov for receipt number AGANDC-12725632. (Roberts, Victor) Modified on 8/9/2023 contacted attorney to refile, see doc.#4(rsg). |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC. (ane) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Terry Batts. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12740153) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ane) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Batts v. Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Terry Batts | |
Represented By: | Victor Severin Roberts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Novolex Heritage Bag, LLC | |
Represented By: | John W. Stapleton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.