Smith v. Maddox et al
Stephenson Lamar Smith |
Melody M. Maddox, A. Morrell, Andrea Jones, Erica Stanley, Inv. Maldonado, Inv. Burges, Steven Blackman, Alexia, Tyrone Walker, Dwan Drinkard, Sergeant Rudick, Inv. Smallwood, Officer Culbreath, Vic Unit Young, Superviser Michael Young, Sgt. Bentley, Judge Magistr. M. J. McCoyd, Brian Lovell, Benjamin T. Schofield, Temika Murry, Emily C. Donkervoet, Timothy C. Batten, Sr., Justin S. Anand, U.S. Marshal Office's and U.S. Department of Justice Office |
1:2023cv03454 |
August 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Timothy C Batten |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Stephenson Lamar Smith re #6 Clerk's Judgment, #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (dmb) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (dmb)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5 ORDER adopting #3 Final Report and Recommendation. This action is dismissed without prejudice, and a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 9/27/2023. (dmb) |
Civil Case Terminated. (dmb) |
Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Stephenson Lamar Smith, to District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr.. (dmb) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Order ruling on IFP,, Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 9/8/2023. (dmb) |
Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis and FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Stephenson Lamar Smith be dismissed without prejudice and a certificate of appealability be denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 9/8/2023. (dmb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Stephenson Lamar Smith re #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation, #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Stephenson Lamar Smith. (dmb) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Stephenson Lamar Smith re #2 Order of Recusal. (dmb) |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus to Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon. (dmb) |
Filing 2 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand recused. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon for all further proceedings NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:23-cv-3454-TCB-RDC. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand on 8/10/2023. (dmb) |
Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for IFP and frivolity determination to Magistrate Judge Justin S. Anand. (kng) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Stephenson Lamar Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(kng) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.