Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC et al v. Sweat, Jr. et al
| Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and Peter Atom Sullivan |
| Forrest W. Sweat, Jr. and Susan D. Sweat |
| 1:2023cv03547 |
| August 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 09 Application for Confirmation of Arbitration Award |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 8/10/2023. (bnp)
|
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Peter Atom Sullivan identifying Corporate Parent Fidelity Global Brokerage Group, Inc. for Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Peter Atom Sullivan. (tht) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC and Peter Atom Sullivan. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12805049) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Arbitration Award FINRA No. 19-02624, #2 Exhibit B - April 5, 2023 FINRA Waiver Letter, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
