Jean-Saurel v. Bennett et al
Margareth Jean-Saurel |
Jamie Bennett and C.R. England, Inc. |
1:2023cv03670 |
August 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Michael L Brown |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Electronically transmitted certified copy of remand order to State Court of Gwinnett County. (kng) |
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING #5 Motion to Remand to State Court. The Court REMANDS this case to the State Court of Gwinnett County. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 9/18/2023. (kng) |
Civil Case Terminated. (kng) |
Submission of #5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (jpk) |
Filing 10 First Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Margareth Jean-Saurel. (Pryor, Scott) |
Submission of #4 Order to Show Cause to District Judge Michael L. Brown. (jpk) |
Filing 9 Defendant Jamie Bennett's ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Jamie Bennett.(Sessions, Matthew) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 8 Defendant C.R. England's ANSWER to #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by C.R. England, Inc.. Discovery ends on 2/5/2024.(Sessions, Matthew) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Margareth Jean-Saurel. (Pryor, Scott) |
Filing 6 RESPONSE re #5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court and re #4 to Show Cause Order filed by Jamie Bennett, C.R. England, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- to Response - Email Offering to Settle Case, #2 Exhibit 2 - to Response - Email confirming receipt of Offer)(Sessions, Matthew) |
Filing 5 First MOTION to Remand to State Court with Brief In Support by Margareth Jean-Saurel. (Pryor, Scott) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: At this time, diversity jurisdiction is lacking, and the Court may not exercise subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332. The Court thus ORDERS Defendants to SHOW CAUSE, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order, why this case should not be remanded for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. To the extent Defendants believe diversity jurisdiction is proper, the Court ORDERS Defendants to supplement their notice of removal to show compliance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. 1332. Failure to do so will result in the Court remanding this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to submit this matter to the undersigned after the expiration of the deadline. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/23/2023. (jpk) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jamie Bennett, C.R. England, Inc.. (Sessions, Matthew) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/26/2021. (jpk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with COMPLAINT filed by Jamie Bennett and C.R. England, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-12823813) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Original Pleadings, #2 Exhibit Email, #3 Exhibit Notice of Removal, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.