Daniels v. United States Postal Service et al
| Amaris Evans Daniels |
| United States Postal Service, Louis DeJoy, Postmaster, Newnan, Coweta County, Georgia, Olga L. Dockery, USPS John Does of the United States Postal Service and Northrop Grumman Corporation |
| 1:2023cv03760 |
| August 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| P.I.: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Northrop Grumman Corporation, Postmaster, Newnan, Coweta County, Georgia, United States Postal Service. (tas) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED SUMMONS filed by Amaris Evans Daniels Summons to Defendants (Attachments: #1 Summons Summons for Northrop, #2 Summons Summons for USA, #3 Summons Summons for USPS Postmaster, #4 Summons Summons for USPS Torts, #5 Summons Summons for USPS, #6 Summons Summons for John Does)(Mosby, Ricardo) |
Filing 2
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 08/29/2023. (tht)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Amaris Evans Daniels. (Filing fee $402, receipt number CGANDC-12837016) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
