ScanComm LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation
ScanComm LLC |
LinkedIn Corporation |
1:2023cv03856 |
August 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steve C Jones |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (rsg) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice filed by ScanComm LLC (Alexander, Cortney) |
Clerk's Entry of Dismissal APPROVING #11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.41(a)(1)(A)(i). (rsg) |
Civil Case Terminated. (rsg) |
DOCKET ORDER denying #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 10/03/2023. (pdw) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by ScanComm LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Alexander, Cortney) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond. Defendant LinkedIn Corporation shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before November 6, 2023. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 09/08/2023. (ddm) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by ScanComm LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Alexander, Cortney) |
Filing 7 COURT'S NOTICE Of Filing INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES.(pdw) |
Filing 6 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (pdt) |
Filing 5 (DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR) AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (pdt) Modified on 8/31/2023 to edit docket text (pdt). |
Notification of Docket Correction re #3 A.O. Form 120. Document was filed in error. (pdt) |
Filing 3 (DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR) AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (pdt) Modified on 8/31/2023 to edit docket text (pdt). |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to LinkedIn Corporation. (pdt) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ScanComm LLC. (pdt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by ScanComm LLC. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12848576) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Patent No. 11,003,878, #2 Exhibit B - Claim Chart for the '878 Patent, #3 Exhibit C - Article re LinkedIn's Atlanta Office, #4 Form AO120 Report, #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ScanComm LLC v. LinkedIn Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: ScanComm LLC | |
Represented By: | Cortney Alexander |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: LinkedIn Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.