Mokarram-Dorri v. Laitinen et al
Plaintiff: Nassireddin Mokarram-Dorri
Defendant: Chip Laitinen and Antony Blinken
Case Number: 1:2023cv03937
Filed: September 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Steve C Jones
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2023 Filing 5 COURT'S NOTICE Of Filing INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES.(pdw)
September 20, 2023 Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by Nassireddin Mokarram-Dorri. Antony Blinken served on 9/14/2023, answer due 11/13/2023; Chip Laitinen served on 9/14/2023, answer due 11/13/2023. (Goldstein, Joshua)
September 11, 2023 Opinion or Order DOCKET ORDER granting #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Joshua L. Goldstein. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 9/11/2023. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(pdw)
September 10, 2023 APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #3 APPLICATION for Admission of Joshua L. Goldstein, Esq Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12872956). Attorney Joshua Laban Goldstein added appearing on behalf of Nassireddin Mokarram-Dorri. E-filing access may be requested after an order granting the application is entered. (rvb)
September 8, 2023 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission of Joshua L. Goldstein, Esq Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12872956). with Brief In Support by Nassireddin Mokarram-Dorri. (Coleman, Ellaretha) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse.
September 1, 2023 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Chip Laitinen, Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney Ryan K. Buchanan. (jkb)
September 1, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Nassireddin Mokarram-Dorri. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AGANDC-12859284) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mokarram-Dorri v. Laitinen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nassireddin Mokarram-Dorri
Represented By: Ellaretha Jones Coleman
Represented By: Joshua Laban Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chip Laitinen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?