Fredericks v. The United States of America et al
Curtio Malik Fredericks |
The United States of America, The United States Department of Justice, The United States Postal Service and Dave Anthony Peters |
1:2023cv04124 |
September 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Mark H Cohen |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER re: Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 9/19/2023. (lme) |
Filing 5 Electronic Summons Issued as to Dave Anthony Peters. (lwb) |
Filing 4 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service mailed to The United States of America on 9/13/2023. (lwb) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service mailed to The United States Department of Justice on 9/13/2023. (lwb) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service mailed to The United States of America on 9/13/2023. (lwb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Curtio Malik Fredericks. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12882683) (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.