Scelsi v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
| Cristina Scelsi |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
| 1:2023cv04187 |
| September 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| John K Larkins |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER denying as moot #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove the indication that the report and recommendation is pending #3 . Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/19/2023. c:Financial Office(dnb)
|
| Submission of #3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cristina Scelsi, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (dnb) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT filed by Cristina Scelsi. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 100007086) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dnb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Filing Fee Paid: $ 402, receipt number 100007086 (dnb) |
| NOTICE of Service of Social Security Complaint. Pursuant to Supplemental Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing notifying the USA and the Regional SSA Office of General Counsel of the #6 Complaint. No summons shall issue. Commissioner, Social Security Administration served on 10/18/2023, answer due 1/26/2024. Counsel for USA must enter a notice of appearance prior to viewing documents in this civil action. (dnb) |
| CLERK'S Notification of Reassignment to US Magistrate Judge Pursuant to Standing Order 07-02 re: #5 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III for all further proceedings. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:23-cv-04187-JKL. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. (tmf) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Cristina Scelsi. (Blakeney, Walter) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/3/2023. (tmf)
|
| Filing 3 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Cristina Scelsi. The Court RECOMMENDS that the IFP application [Doc. #1 ] be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/3/2023. (tmf) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Dalton Windham on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Windham, Robert) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (jkb) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Cristina Scelsi. (Attachments: #1 Motion for IFP, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
