Hall v. The United States of America
| Howard Hall |
| The United States of America |
| 1:2023cv04189 |
| September 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| Airplane |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #7 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Nicole C. Andersen. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 9/28/2023. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(kng)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Nicole C. Andersen re #8 Order on Application for Admission PHV. (kng) |
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #7 APPLICATION for Admission of Nicole C. Andersen Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12911822). Attorney Nicole C. Andersen added appearing on behalf of Howard Hall. E-filing access may be requested after an order granting the application is entered. (rvb) |
| Filing 7 APPLICATION for Admission of Nicole C. Andersen Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12911822).by Howard Hall. (Barks, Daniel) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
| Filing 6 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Nicole Andersen. Clerk to follow-up by 10/6/2023. (djs) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Stuart Fraenkel. Clerk to follow-up by 10/6/2023. (djs) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER regarding Civil Litigation. Signed by Judge Michael L. Brown on 8/26/2021. (jpk)
|
| Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to The United States of America C/O The Hon. Ryan K. Buchanan, U.S. Attorney (dnb) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to The United States of America, C/O The Hon. Merrick Garland, Attorney General (dnb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Howard Hall. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12889723) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(dnb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hall v. The United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Howard Hall | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Douglass Barks |
| Represented By: | Nicole C. Andersen |
| Represented By: | Stuart Fraenkel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
