Honeycutt v. Labat et al
Taylor Braxton Honeycutt |
Sheriff Patrick Labat, Sgt. Obasi and Head of Maintenance |
1:2023cv04317 |
September 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
John K Larkins |
Leigh Martin May |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #6 Order to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (bnp) |
Filing 7 Return of Service Executed. Head of Maintenance served on 11/4/2023, answer due 11/27/2023; Patrick Labat served on 11/4/2023, answer due 11/27/2023; Obasi served on 11/4/2023, answer due 11/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Sgt. Obasi, #2 Patrick Labat)(tht) |
Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's claim for deliberate indifference to his safety against Defendants Labat and the Head of Maintenance at the Jail, as well as his medical deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Labat and Obasi are ALLOWED TO PROCEED as any other civil action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Plaintiff a USM 285 form and summons for Defendants Labat, the Head of Maintenance, and Obasi. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to complete a USM 285 form and summons for each Defendant and return them to the Clerk within twenty (20) days from the date this Order is entered. The Court warns Plaintiff that failure to comply in a timely manner could result in the dismissal of this action. The Clerk is DIRECTED to resubmit this action to me if Plaintiff fails to comply. Upon receipt of the forms, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare a service waiver package for each Defendant. In the event that any Defendant does not return an executed Waiver of Service form to the Clerk of Court within thirty-five (35) days following the date the service waiver package is mailed, the Clerk is DIRECTED to prepare and transmit to the U.S. Marshal's Service a service package for that Defendant. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to serve upon Defendants or their counsel a copy of every additional pleading or other document which is filed with the Clerk of the Court. Plaintiff is also REQUIRED to KEEP the Court and Defendants advised of his current address at all times during the pendency of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/30/2023. (tht) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Taylor Braxton Honeycutt re #6 Order. Forms sent to party: USM 285 (3 copies), and summons (3 copies). (tht) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Taylor Braxton Honeycutt and Warden (address: Fulton County Jail 901 Rice Street, NW Atlanta, GA 30318-4900) re #5 Order. (tht) |
Filing 5 ORDER: Plaintiff's request to proceed IFP Dkt. #2 and #4 is GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall be allowed to proceed without paying an initial partial filing fee. However, Plaintiff shall be obligated to pay the full statutory filing fee of $350.00 as funds are deposited in his inmate account pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). It is further ordered that: The Clerk of the Court transmit a copy of this Order to the warden of the institution where Plaintiff is incarcerated; and the warden of the institution, or his designee, shall collect the aforesaid monthly payments from Plaintiff's inmate account and remit such payments to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Service of process shall not issue at the present time pending further consideration of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/25/2023. (tht) |
Filing 4 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Taylor Braxton Honeycutt. (tht) |
Filing 3 ORDER: It is Ordered that Plaintiff must, within thirty days of the date of this Order, either submit the full $402.00 filing and administrative fees, or execute and return a financial affidavit seeking leave to proceed IFP on the proper forms that the Clerk will provide to him, which includes an executed authorization form and a certified copy of his inmate trust account balance for the six-month period preceding the filing of this case. Plaintiff is advised that failure to pay the fee or submit the required affidavit may result in dismissal of this action. Plaintiff is cautioned that even if he is allowed to proceed IFP, he must nevertheless pay the full amount of the $350.00 filing fee from his prisoner account. The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward the appropriate financial affidavit to Plaintiff together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk is FURTHER DIRECTED to submit this action to the undersigned Magistrate Judge at the expiration of the aforementioned time period. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/04/2023. (tht) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Taylor Braxton Honeycutt re #3 Order. Forms sent to party: Affidavit and Authorization. (tht) |
Submission of #2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (jkb) |
Filing 2 Affidavit and Authorization for withdrawal from Inmate Account by Taylor Braxton Honeycutt. (jkb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Taylor Braxton Honeycutt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.