Johnson v. Reeves
Paul Lamont Johnson |
Angela Reeves |
1:2023cv04364 |
September 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steve C Jones |
John K Larkins |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Petitioner shall have through November 13, 2023 to file his Objections to the R&R. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 11/01/2023. (rsg) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Paul Lamont Johnson re #7 Order on Motion for Extension of Time. (rsg) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to the #3 Final Report and Recommendation filed by Paul Lamont Johnson. (ddm) |
Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Paul Lamont Johnson, #5 Affidavit, to District Judge Steve C. Jones. (pdw) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH filed by Paul Lamont Johnson. (ddm) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Service of #3 Order and Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/05/2023. (ddm) |
Filing 3 ORDER and FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GRANTING Petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis #2 and RECOMMENDING that the instant petition #1 be DISMISSED as successive under Rule 4. It is further RECOMMENDING that a COA be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 10/05/2023. (ddm) |
Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Paul Lamont Johnson re #3 Order and Final Report and Recommendation, #4 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (ddm) |
Submission of #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (lwb) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Paul Lamont Johnson. (lwb) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Paul Lamont Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Reeves | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Paul Lamont Johnson | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Angela Reeves | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.