Keaton v. Opmax Services of Georgia LLC
| Jamila Keaton |
| Opmax Services of Georgia LLC |
| 1:2023cv04367 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Regina D Cannon |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons by Jamila Keaton. (Roberts, Victor) |
Filing 9
ORDER directing counsel for Plaintiff to file the required Certificate of Interested Persons on or before 11/29/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 11/22/2023. (dob)
|
| Filing 8 Guidelines for Discovery and Motion Practice Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 11/22/2023. (dob) |
| Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Opmax Services of Georgia LLC. (Bosin, Joshua) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand by Opmax Services of Georgia LLC. Discovery ends on 4/19/2024.(Bosin, Joshua) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Defendant has moved, with Plaintiff's consent, to extend the deadline to respond to Plaintiff's complaint from October 30, 2023 through November 21, 2023. (Doc. #4 ). This is Defendant's first such extension request. Upon due consideration, the motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint on or before November 21, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Regina D Cannon on 10/31/2023. (tmf)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with Brief In Support by Opmax Services of Georgia LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Bosin, Joshua) Modified on 10/31/2023 to add Consent to the title(lme). |
| Filing 3 Return of Service Executed by Jamila Keaton. Opmax Services of Georgia LLC served on 10/9/2023, answer due 10/30/2023. (Roberts, Victor) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Opmax Services of Georgia LLC. (jkb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Jamila Keaton. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12911171) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Keaton v. Opmax Services of Georgia LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jamila Keaton | |
| Represented By: | Victor Severin Roberts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Opmax Services of Georgia LLC | |
| Represented By: | Joshua Isaac Bosin |
| Represented By: | Matthew T. Covell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
