Link v. State of Georgia
| Gary N. Link |
| State of Georgia |
| 1:2023cv04405 |
| September 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Eleanor L Ross |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (ces)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 5
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the R&R as the opinion of this Court. #2 . For the reasons stated in the R&R, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Eleanor L. Ross on 11/6/23. (ces)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Gary N. Link re #6 Clerk's Judgment, #5 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (ces) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (ces) |
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint, filed by Gary N. Link, to District Judge Eleanor L. Ross. (mlb) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE FROM THE COURT: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE ELEANOR L. ROSS. (mlb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing to Gary Link as to Gary N. Link re #4 Order. (mlb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/13/23. (ces)
|
| Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint: I DENY Link permission to proceed in forma pauperis in this civil action. I RECOMMEND that this civil action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. I DIRECT the Clerk to terminate the referral of this civil action to me. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 10/13/23. (ces) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Gary N. Link re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation (ces) |
| Submission of #1 Complaint, to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (jkb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Gary N. Link. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Link v. State of Georgia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gary N. Link | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: State of Georgia | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
