Pinkston v. Brown et al
| Jabarr Desmond Pinkston |
| Ezell Brown and Sgt. Jefferson |
| 1:2023cv04459 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Mark H Cohen |
| Russell G Vineyard |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jabarr Desmond Pinkston re #3 Order to Show Cause. Envelope marked: RTS, Attempted not known. (tmf) |
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause why this action should not be DISMISSED for failure to comply with the Court's Order and for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) by filing a written response with the Clerk of Court within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order. Plaintiff also shall file an amended complaint and either pay the fee or submit a financial affidavit as previously ordered within TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to respond within the specified period of time may result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Local Rule 41.3(A)(2). The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the undersigned Magistrate Judge twenty-four (24) days from the entry date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 11/14/2023. (tmf)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jabarr Desmond Pinkston re #3 Order to Show Cause,,,. (tmf) |
| Submission of #2 Order to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (lme) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit an amended complaint within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the entry date of this order. Plaintiff must select only those claims that are logically related or arise out of the same transaction or occurrence to pursue in the instant action and may not incorporate by reference any portion of his original complaint into the amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must, within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of the entry date of this order, either submit the full filing and administrative fee of $402.00, or execute and return a financial affidavit seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to stamp the civil action number on a standard 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil action form and forward the form and the appropriate financial affidavit to plaintiff, together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to resubmit this action to the assigned Magistrate Judge upon receipt of the amended complaint and full filing and administrative fee or affidavit or at the expiration of the time period noted above. See document for further specifics and instructions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 10/4/2023. (tmf)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Jabarr Desmond Pinkston re #2 Order, Prisoner IFP form, 1983 form. (tmf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jabarr Desmond Pinkston. (filed as a new case as directed in 1:23-cv-2887) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tmf) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
| Submission of #1 Complaint, for IFP, to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (tmf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
