Smith et al v. USAA Federal Saving Bank
| William C. Smith and William C. Smith, III |
| USAA Federal Saving Bank |
| 1:2023cv04470 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| William M Ray |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William C. Smith, III re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (dob) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William C. Smith re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (dob) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT filed by William C. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dob) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 10/31/2023. (dob)
|
| Submission of #3 Complaint, to District Judge William M. Ray II. (dob) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William C. Smith. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ces) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (ces) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
