Wright v. Foursight Capital et al
| Joshua Wright |
| Foursight Capital and Andy Williams |
| 1:2023cv04538 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (tht)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist-- |
Filing 9
ORDER: Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise filed a response to the Court's Order. Accordingly, this matter is hereby DISMISSED under Rule 41.3 of the Local Rules of this Court for failure to follow its lawful Order. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/30/2023. (tht)
|
| Submission of #8 Order to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (tht) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joshua Wright re #9 Order, #10 Clerk's Judgment(tht) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Dkt. No. #2 , as its opinion: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, Dkt. No. #1 , is DENIED. Within 21 days of the entry of this Order, Plaintiff SHALL pay the Court's full filing fee. Failure to timely comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/02/2023. (tht)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joshua Wright re #8 Order. (tht) |
| Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (bnp) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed. Foursight Capital served on 10/13/2023. (tht) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to COMPLAINT by Foursight Capital. Discovery ends on 3/18/2024.(Leitman, Hal) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Foursight Capital. (Leitman, Hal) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Hal Jordan Leitman on behalf of Foursight Capital (Leitman, Hal) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 10/12/23. (klb)
|
| Filing 2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joshua Wright. Because plaintiff and his spouse's income exceed their monthly expenses by $2,8751 and plaintiff has access to $1,412.01 in funds via two checking accounts, the undersigned REPORTS that he has funds and assets sufficient to pay the $402 filing fee. Accordingly, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that plaintiff's IFP Application #1 be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 10/12/23. c:Financial Office(klb) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Joshua Wright re #3 Order for Service of Final Report and Recommendation and #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. (klb) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joshua Wright. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (pdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
