Goodrum v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
James Edward Goodrum, Jr. |
Commissioner of Social Security and Commissioner, Social Security Administration |
1:2023cv04699 |
October 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Eleanor L Ross |
Catherine M Salinas |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Dalton Windham on behalf of Commissioner, Social Security Administration (Windham, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by James Edward Goodrum, Jr. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-12951400) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
NOTICE of Service of Social Security Complaint. Pursuant to Supplemental Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing notifying the USA and the Regional SSA Office of General Counsel of the #1 Complaint. No summons shall issue. Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/16/2023, answer due 1/24/2024. Counsel for USA must enter a notice of appearance prior to viewing documents in this civil action. (pdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.