Harris v. State of Georgia
Petitioner: John Harris
Respondent: State of Georgia
Case Number: 1:2023cv04993
Filed: October 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Sarah E Geraghty
Referring Judge: John K Larkins
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2023 Filing 5 CLERK'S JUDGMENT dismissing action. (ane)--Please refer to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov to obtain an appeals jurisdiction checklist--
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING #2 Final Report and Recommendation. The petition is DISMISSED as successive under Rule 4, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the case. Along with this order, the Clerk is DIRECTED to send Petitioner the attached application for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 12/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Application for Leave to File a second or successive habeas petition) (ane)
December 4, 2023 Civil Case Terminated. (ane)
December 4, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to John Harris re #4 Order on Final Report and Recommendation, #5 Clerk's Judgment. Forms sent to party: Second and Successive Habeas Petition Forms. (ane)
November 29, 2023 Submission of #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to District Judge Sarah E. Geraghty. (sap)
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 11/6/2023. (ane)
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER GRANTING In Forma Pauperis and FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by John Harris be DISMISSED as successive under Rule 4 and that a COA be DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 11/6/2023. (ane)
November 6, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to John Harris re #2 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (ane)
October 31, 2023 Submission of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (jkb)
October 30, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Harris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jkb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. State of Georgia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: John Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Georgia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?