Estrada v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation
| Michael Estrada |
| Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Krispy Kreme |
| 1:2023cv05040 |
| November 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Thomas W Thrash |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Clerk's Notation re #6 Certificate of Interested Persons/Corporate Disclosure Statement. Reviewed and approved by Judge Thrash. (jeh) |
| Filing 6 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc., Corporate Parent Cotton Parent, Inc., Corporate Parent Krispy Kreme, Inc. for Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation. (Salman, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation. Discovery ends on 5/24/2024.(Salman, Andrew) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
ORDER (by docket entry) granting #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation Answer due 12/26/2023. Ordered by Judge Thomas W. Thrash, Jr. on 11/21/2023. (jeh)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation. (Salman, Andrew) |
| Refund in the amount of $402.00 has been processed, effective 11/7/2023 in response to Clerks Action on Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (kns) |
| Clerks Approval re #3 Application for Refund of Fees paid online. (mec) |
| Filing 3 Application for Refund of Fees paid online through Pay.gov for receipt number AGANDC-13003539. (Pope, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation. (ces) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael Estrada. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-13003583) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ces) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Estrada v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Estrada | |
| Represented By: | Matthew N. Pope |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation a Foreign Profit Corporation doing business as Krispy Kreme | |
| Represented By: | Andrew C Salman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
