Jones v. Atlanta Gas Light
| Rasheirra Jones |
| Atlanta Gas Light |
| 1:2023cv05149 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| J Elizabeth McBath |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #2 Order to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (bnp) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Parties. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 12/07/2023. (tht) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rasheirra Jones re #4 Notice to Pro Se Parties. (tht) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Rasheirra Jones. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Filing 2
ORDER granting #1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file, within 30 days from the entry of this Order, an amended complaint in accordance with the guidance provided in the body of this Order as well as the following instructions: (1) Attach to her amended complaint a copy of the Charge of Discrimination she filed with the EEOC and a copy of the Notice of Right to Sue letter from the EEOC; (2) Provide a brief factual background section with facts relevant to all claims, presented in logical order (which may or may not be chronological) in individually numbered paragraphs; and (3) Allege each cause of action under a separate count and, underneath each count in separately numbered paragraphs, provide: (a) the relevant statute and the particular provision(s) of the statute violated; and (b) the relevant facts, including dates, that she believes entitle her to relief and that specifically support the necessary elements of each claim. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 12/01/2023. (tht)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Rasheirra Jones re #2 Order on Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (tht) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (jbu) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rasheirra Jones. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(jbu) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Atlanta Gas Light | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rasheirra Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Atlanta Gas Light | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
