Theulen et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Renae N. Theulen and Christopher A. Theulen |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 1:2023cv05200 |
| November 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Banks and Banking |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1693 Electronic Funds Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Ebbs, Arthur) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Discovery ends on 5/20/2024.(Ebbs, Arthur) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 11/16/2023. (bnp)
|
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (jbu) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Renae N. Theulen, Christopher A. Theulen. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AGANDC-13024665) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jbu) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
