Gwinnett County Police Department v. El
Plaintiff: Gwinnett County Police Department
Defendant: William El and Aton Aiman Akbar Rooh El
Case Number: 1:2023cv05398
Filed: November 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Mark H Cohen
Referring Judge: Amy Totenberg
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER APPROVING AND ADOPTING the Final Report and Recommendation #5 as the Opinion and Order of the Court. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's application to proceed in forma pauperis #1 is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall be given fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order to pay the required filing fee in this case. Failure to pay the filing fee within that period of time will result in this Court entering an order dismissing this case without prejudice for want of prosecution. Signed by Judge Mark H. Cohen on 1/12/2024. (dgr)
January 12, 2024 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William El re #8 Order on Final Report and Recommendation. (dgr)
January 9, 2024 Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to William El re #2 Order. (dgr)
January 9, 2024 Submission of #5 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by William El to District Judge Mark H. Cohen. (lme)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER for Service of #5 Final Report and Recommendation, by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 12/15/23. (klb)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - the undersigned REPORTS that the information submitted by defendant [1, 4] is insufficient to find he is a pauper and RECOMMENDS that his request to proceed without pre paying the filing fee #1 be DENIED and that defendant be DIRECTED to pay the $405 filing fee in order to proceed with this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 12/15/23. c:Financial Office(klb)
December 15, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William El re #5 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and #6 Order for Service of Final Report and Recommendation. (klb)
December 14, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE Of Filing Affidavit of Fact and Notice of Amendment and Addendum by William El (dmb)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DECLINING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Mark H. Cohen for all further proceedings. Judge Amy Totenberg no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:23-cv-05398-MHC. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 12/4/2023. (tmf)
December 4, 2023 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (tmf)
December 4, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William El re #3 Order Declining Case. (tmf)
November 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER - Because the information provided in defendant's Affidavit is insufficient to judge his status as a pauper, the Court ORDERS defendant to submit a completed form Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs, or submit the full civil filing fee of $405.00 (effective December 1, 2023) on or before December 15, 2023. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail defendant the appropriate financial affidavit and application, together with a copy of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED TO RESUBMIT this action to the assigned Magistrate Judge upon receipt of the filing fee or affidavit, or on the above deadline. ( Forms sent to party: Affidavit to Proceed IFP; ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson on 11/29/23. (klb)
November 29, 2023 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to William El re #2 Order and Forms Sent. (klb)
November 27, 2023 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William El. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jbu)
November 27, 2023 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, to Magistrate Judge Walter E. Johnson. (jbu)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gwinnett County Police Department v. El
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William El
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aton Aiman Akbar Rooh El
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gwinnett County Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?