DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Samsara, Inc.
| DataCloud Technologies, LLC |
| Samsara, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv05514 |
| December 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steve C Jones |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (of 30 days; up to February 26, 2024; Second Request) with Brief In Support by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Miller, Jonathan) |
| Filing 10 COURT'S NOTICE Of Filing INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES. (pdw) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting the parties' #8 Consent Motion for Extension of Time, up to and including January 26, 2024, for Defendant Samsara, Inc. to respond to #1 Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Steve C. Jones on 12/20/2023. (ddm)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (of 30 days; up to January 26, 2024) with Brief In Support by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Miller, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 Return of Service Executed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. Samsara, Inc. served on 12/6/2023, answer due 12/27/2023. (Miller, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan Robert Miller on behalf of DataCloud Technologies, LLC (Miller, Jonathan) |
| Filing 5 AO Form 120 forwarded to Commissioner. (ddm) |
| Filing 4 PROPOSED AO 120 . (McDonough, James) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by DataCloud Technologies, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (McDonough, James) |
| Notice of deficiency re AO Form 120. Plaintiff must complete and file AO Form 120. See LR 3.4 and LPR 1.4. Docket the form using the event AO 120, located in the Other Filings/Other Documents menu. (pdt) |
| Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Samsara, Inc. (pdt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13067578) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Samsara, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DataCloud Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | James F. McDonough, III |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Robert Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Samsara, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
