The Braden Fellman Group LTD v. Subrena Miller
| The Braden Fellman Group LTD |
| Subrena Miller |
| 1:2023cv05566 |
| December 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Leigh Martin May |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Case electronically remanded to Magistrate Court of Fulton County with certified #4 Order and #5 Remand letter. (tht) Modified on 12/8/2023 - case is remanded via mail due to TylerTech system rejecting filing 3 times citing no payment (tht). |
| Filing 5 Remand Letter (tht) |
Filing 4
ORDER: The Clerk is DIRECTED to REMAND this case to Fulton CountyMagistrate Court. Signed by Judge Leigh Martin May on 12/06/2023. (tht)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Subrena Miller re #2 Order and #4 Order to Remand. (tht) |
| Civil Case Terminated. (tht) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Emergency Motion for Writ of Possession with COMPLAINT filed by Subrena Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Defendant's request to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby GRANTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a), and she shall be allowed to proceed with this action without prepayment of filing fees, docket costs, or United States Marshals Service fees. However, it is further ORDERED that service of process shall not issue at the present time, and the Clerk shall submit this file to the assigned District Judge for consideration of the emergency motion to stay and a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard on 12/05/2023. (tht)
|
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Subrena Miller. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal with Emergency motion to stay writ of possession, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(tht) |
| Submission of #3 Notice of Removal and Emergency Motion for Writ of Possession for a frivolity determination under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) to District Judge Leigh Martin May. (tht) |
| Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge Russell G. Vineyard. (tht) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Braden Fellman Group LTD v. Subrena Miller | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Braden Fellman Group LTD | |
| Represented By: | James M. Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Subrena Miller | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
