United Community Bank v. Lamei
United Community Bank |
Hesam Lamei and Hessam Lamei |
1:2023cv05768 |
December 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steven D Grimberg |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Hesam Lamei. (Jones, Leon) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 COMPLAINT by Hesam Lamei. Discovery ends on 6/20/2024.(Jones, Leon) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov to obtain Pretrial Instructions. |
Filing 4 Return of Service Executed by United Community Bank. Hesam Lamei served on 1/2/2024, answer due 1/23/2024. (Levy, Brian) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Steven D. Grimberg on 12/27/2023. (tas) |
Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Hesam Lamei. (jbu) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by United Community Bank. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13100428) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note 1, #2 Exhibit B - Note 2, #3 Exhibit C - Guarantees, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(jbu) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.