Albritton v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
Lola Albritton |
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Women's Health, LLC |
1:2023cv06006 |
December 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Leigh Martin May |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Waivers of Service Executed by Lola Albritton re #1 Complaint, Defendants Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Women's Health Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrison, Daniel) |
Remark: Counsel should review all Orders docketed in MDL Case No. 1:20-md-2974-LMM. The Court's Case Management Orders and other case-related documents can also be found on the Court's MDL web page: https://www.gand.uscourts.gov/20md2974 (bnp) |
|
Filing 1 SHORT FORM COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Lola Albritton. Direct File MDL-USDC Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13124378) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Civil Case Terminated. (pdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.