Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. National Credit Systems, Inc.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau |
National Credit Systems, Inc. |
1:2023mi00007 |
February 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
J Clay Fuller |
William M Ray |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Submission of #5 MOTION to Stay , to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (clk) |
Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Stay filed by National Credit Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Joel Lackey In Support of Reply)(Bedard, John) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION to Stay filed by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Opposition to Stay Motion)(Garlock, Stephanie) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Garlock on behalf of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Garlock, Stephanie) |
Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING the CFPB to respond to NCS's #5 MOTION to Stay NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS from the date of entry of this Order. NCS may file a reply NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS from the date the CFPB files its response. NCS' #6 MOTION for Extension of Time Respond to the #1 Petition to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand is GRANTED. NCS shall not be required to respond to the petition until the Court rules on NCS's motion to stay, at which time the Court will provide further direction concerning NCS's response to the CFPB's petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 3/13/2023. (adg) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time Respond To The Petition [Doc. 1] re: #1 MOTION to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand with Brief In Support by National Credit Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motion for Extension)(Bedard, John) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Stay with Brief In Support by National Credit Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Of Law In Support, #2 Exhibit A - Letter Brief to U.S. Supreme Court On Behalf Of CFPB, #3 Exhibit B - Order Staying Case - CFPB v. MoneyGram, #4 Exhibit C - Order Reaffirming Stay, CFPB v. MoneyGram, #5 Exhibit Declaration of Joel Lackey)(Bedard, John) Modified on 3/13/2023 to edit text (lwb). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John H. Bedard, Jr on behalf of National Credit Systems, Inc. (Bedard, John) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Attachments: #1 proof of service)(Baldwin, Sarah) |
Filing 2 ORDER DIRECTING National Credit Systems, Inc. to respond to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's #1 MOTION to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand no later than 21 DAYS after the date of entry of this Order. The CFPB may file a reply NO LATER THAN 14 DAYS after the date NCS files its response. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller on 2/24/2023. (adg) |
Submission of #1 MOTION to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand to Magistrate Judge J. Clay Fuller. (pdt) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Enforce Civil Investigative Demand by Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Petition to Enforce, #2 Declaration in Support of Petition to Enforce, #3 Exhibit 1 - Civil Investigative Demand, Oct 18, 2022, #4 Exhibit 2 - NCS Petition to Set Aside CID, #5 Exhibit 3 - Bureau Decision and Order, #6 Exhibit 4 - Service of Decision and Order, #7 Exhibit 5 - NCS letter, Jan 11, 2023, #8 Text of Proposed Order to Show Cause, #9 Text of Proposed Order to Comply, #10 Civil Cover Sheet)(pdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.