Subpoena Issued to Caldwell Cassady & Curry
| Subpoena Issued to Caldwell Casssady & Curry and Subpoena Issued to Caldwell Cassady & Curry |
| Apple Inc. |
| 1:2023mi00030 |
| April 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Catherine M Salinas |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER denying as moot Apple, Inc.'s #1 Motion to Quash Document Subpoena or, in the Alternative, to Transfer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 4/17/2023. (bgt)
|
| Filing 3 Plaintiff's Notice of Withdrawal of Subpoena Directed to Caldwell Cassady & Curry (Attachments: #1 Subpoena to Caldwell Cassady & Curry)(North, John) |
| Miscellaneous Case Terminated. (bgt) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Apple Inc. (Whitley, Dexter) Modified on 4/12/2023 (lwb). |
| Submission of #1 MOTION to Quash Document Subpoena to Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas. (lwb) |
| Filing 1 Apple Inc.'s MOTION to Quash Document Subpoena or in the alternative, to Transfer with Brief In Support. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Whitley Declaration, #15 Proposed Order, #16 Civil Cover Sheet)(lwb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
