Young v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
| Richard Young, III |
| Bank of America, N.A., Nereida G. Diaz and Louise B. Marencik |
| 1:2023mi00039 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Michael L Brown |
| John K Larkins |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #2 Order to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (jpk) |
Filing 2
ORDER: Mr. Young is therefore ORDERED, no later than June 26, 2023, to either pay the balance of the required $402 filing fee or complete and submit this Court's form affidavit attesting that he is unable to afford the fee, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Mr. Young is advised that failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of his case. The Clerk is DIRECTED to submit the matter to the undersigned after expiration of the above time period. Signed by Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins, III on 6/7/2023. (tmf)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Richard Young, III re #2 Order,,, Set Submission Deadline,,. (tmf) |
| Filing 1 Petition to Perpetuate Testimony. Fed. R. Civ. P. 27 (a) by Richard Young, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dnb) |
| Submission of #1 Petition to Perpetuate Testimony. Fed. R. Civ. P. 27 (a), to Magistrate Judge John K. Larkins. (dnb) |
| Filing Fee Paid: $ 49.00, receipt number 100003463 (dnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
