Caddo Systems, Inc. et al v. Progress Software Corporation
| Caddo Systems, Inc. and 511 Technologies, Inc. |
| Progress Software Corporation |
| 1:2023mi00043 |
| May 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| J P Boulee |
| Linda T Walker |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT #1 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 6/6/2023. (nmb)
|
| Miscellaneous Case Terminated. (nmb) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Progress Software Corporation re #1 MOTION to Quash Plaintiff's Third-Party Subpoenas (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 6.2.2023. Email, #2 Exhibit 2 - Proposed Order)(Danzig, Aaron) |
| Submission of #1 MOTION to Quash Plaintiff's Third-Party Subpoenas to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (jkl) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Alex Chan. Clerk to follow-up by 6/12/2023. (rvb) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING parties' #4 Consent MOTION for extension of time for Plaintiffs to file a response to Defendants Motion to Quash. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the deadline by which Plaintiffs must file a response to Defendants Motion to Quash Plaintiffs Third-Party Subpoenas is hereby extended to June 2, 2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker this 30th day of May, 2023. (pdt)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Alex Chan re #6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time. (pdt) |
| Filing 5 PROPOSED CONSENT ORDER for Plaintiff to Respond to Motion to Quash Subpoena re: #4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time for Plaintiffs to File Response re: #1 MOTION to Quash Plaintiff's Third-Party Subpoenas . (Danzig, Aaron) |
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time for Plaintiffs to File Response re: #1 MOTION to Quash Plaintiff's Third-Party Subpoenas by Progress Software Corporation. (Danzig, Aaron) |
|
ORDER granting of James R Anderson's #3 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. So ordered by Judge J. P. Boulee on 5/19/2023. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(jkl)
|
| APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #3 APPLICATION for Admission of James R Anderson Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12605289). Attorney James R. Anderson added appearing on behalf of Progress Software Corporation (djs) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for Admission of James R Anderson Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 150, receipt number AGANDC-12605289).by Progress Software Corporation. (Danzig, Aaron) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
| Filing 2 NOTICE Of Filing Civil Cover Sheet by Progress Software Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Civil Cover Sheet)(Danzig, Aaron) |
| Submission of #1 MOTION to Quash Plaintiff's Third-Party Subpoenas, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (dnb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Plaintiff's Third-Party Subpoenas with Brief In Support by Progress Software Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Brief, #2 Exhibit 1 - Georgia Subpoenas, #3 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Subpoena, #4 Exhibit 3 - Mass. Memo ISO to Compel, #5 Exhibit 4 - Mass. Memo in Opp to Motion to Compel, #6 Exhibit 5 - Markman Hearing Transcript, #7 Exhibit 6 - Mass. Orders, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(dnb) |
| Filing Fee Paid: $ 49.00, receipt number AGANDC-12596112 (dnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
