Allen v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission
| Craig Allen |
| United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| 1:2023mi00073 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
| Steven D Grimberg |
| Linda T Walker |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Submission of #3 FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, to District Judge Steven D. Grimberg. (slc) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Service of #3 Final Report and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 08/25/2023. (tht)
|
|
Filing 3
FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Motion for Order filed by Craig Allen. The undersigned RECOMMENDS that Mr. Allen's Motion be DENIED because he has not shown that he is entitled to an order pursuant to Section 1110 of the RFPA. The undersigned further RECOMMENDS that this action be DISMISSED. As this is a Final Report and Recommendation and there are no other matters pending before this Court, the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate the reference to the undersigned. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 08/25/2023. (tht)
|
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Craig Allen re #3 Final R&R and #4 Order for Service. (tht) |
| Submission of #2 Order, to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (slc) |
| Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Craig Allen re #2 Order. (tht) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, Movant is ORDERED to file a copy of the subpoena [sic], summons, or formal written request at issue and a copy of the Notice to Consumer he was provided in accordance with the RFPA. Mr. Allen is WARNED that a failure to comply with the Court's pretrial instructions may result in dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker on 08/01/2023. (tht)
|
| Submission of #1 MOTION for Order to Magistrate Judge Linda T. Walker. (pdt) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Order Pursuant to Customer Challenge Provisions of the Right to Financial Privacy Act of 1978 by Craig Allen. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) |
| Filing Fee Paid: $ 49.00, receipt number 100005258. (pdt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Allen v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Craig Allen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Securities and Exchange Commission | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
