Truist Bank v. Aspen Heights Holdings, LLC et al
Truist Bank |
Aspen Heights Holdings, LLC and Aspen Topco II, LLC |
1:2024cv00077 |
January 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Steve C Jones |
Amy Totenberg |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Respond by Aspen Heights Holdings, LLC, Aspen Topco II, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Horst, Jeffrey) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Anre Washington on behalf of Aspen Heights Holdings, LLC, Aspen Topco II, LLC (Washington, Anre) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica Gabel Cino on behalf of Aspen Heights Holdings, LLC, Aspen Topco II, LLC (Cino, Jessica) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey D. Horst on behalf of Aspen Heights Holdings, LLC, Aspen Topco II, LLC (Horst, Jeffrey) |
Filing 9 Return of Service Executed by Truist Bank. Aspen Topco II, LLC served on 2/7/2024, answer due 2/28/2024. (Bingham, Ron) |
Filing 8 COURT'S NOTICE Of Filing Standing Order: INSTRUCTIONS FOR CASES ASSIGNED TOTHE HONORABLE STEVE C. JONES. (pdw) |
DOCKET ORDER granting #6 Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Nikolaus F. Schandlbauer. Entered by Judge Steve C. Jones on 2/06/2024. If the applicant does not have CM/ECF access in the Northern District of Georgia already, they must request access at http://pacer.gov. If they have electronically filed in this district in a previous case, please omit this step.(pdw) |
Filing 7 ORDER DECLINING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Steve C. Jones for all further proceedings. Judge Amy Totenberg no longer assigned to case. NOTICE TO ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD: The Judge designation in the civil action number assigned to this case has been changed to 1:24-cv-0077-SCJ. Please make note of this change in order to facilitate the docketing of pleadings in this case. Signed by Judge Amy Totenberg on 1/18/2024. (tmf) |
APPROVAL by Clerks Office re: #6 APPLICATION for Admission of Nikolaus F. Schandlbauer Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13148532). Attorney Nikolaus Schandlbauer added appearing on behalf of Truist Bank. E-filing access may be requested after an order granting the application is entered. (esr) |
Filing 6 APPLICATION for Admission of Nikolaus F. Schandlbauer Pro Hac Vice (Application fee $ 100, receipt number AGANDC-13148532).by Truist Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bingham, Ron) Documents for this entry are not available for viewing outside the courthouse. |
Filing 5 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Nikolaus Schandlbauer. Clerk to follow-up by 1/22/2024. (djs) |
Filing 4 Electronic Summons Issued as to Aspen Heights Holdings, LLC. (pdt) |
Filing 3 Electronic Summons Issued as to Aspen Topco II, LLC. (pdt) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement by Truist Bank. (pdt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Truist Bank. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13138367) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet) (pdt) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.