D23 LLC v. Ballard Et ALL
Plaintiff: D23 LLC
Defendant: Natasha Ballard Et ALL
Case Number: 1:2024cv00095
Filed: January 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Timothy C Batten
Referring Judge: J Elizabeth McBath
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2024 Submission of #2 Final Report and Recommendation,, Order ruling on IFP, #6 Objections to Report and Recommendation to District Judge Timothy C. Batten Sr.. (dmb)
February 29, 2024 Filing 6 OBJECTIONS to #2 Report and Recommendation filed by Natasha Ballard Et ALL. (dmb)
February 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Defendant shall have an additional 30 days to file her objections. Signed by Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. on 2/1/2024. (dmb)
February 1, 2024 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Natasha Ballard Et ALL, D23 LLC re #5 Order on Motion for Extension of Time. (dmb)
January 29, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time to file Objections to the #2 Final Report and Recommendation by Natasha Ballard Et ALL. (dmb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/29/2024: #1 Affidavit) (dmb).
January 17, 2024 Clerk's Certificate of Mailing as to Natasha Ballard Et ALL, D23 LLC re #2 Final Report and Recommendation, Order ruling on IFP, #3 Order for Service of Report and Recommendation. (jkb)
January 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Service of #2 Final Report and Recommendation,, Order ruling on IFP, by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. Each party may file written objections to the Report & Recommendation within 14 days of service. If no objections are filed, the Report & Recommendation may be adopted as the opinion and order of the District Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 01/16/2024. (jkb)
January 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER AND FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Natasha Ballard Et ALL, ORDER DENYING AS MOOT In Forma Pauperis. The Court RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath on 01/16/2024. (jkb)
January 9, 2024 Submission of #1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to Magistrate Judge J. Elizabeth McBath. (kng)
January 8, 2024 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Natasha Ballard Et ALL. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Notice of Removal to USDC, #3 Motion to Compel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(kng)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: D23 LLC v. Ballard Et ALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: D23 LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Natasha Ballard Et ALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?