Chaney v. Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Mark Chaney
Defendant: Cox Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Cox Automotive and Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLC
Case Number: 1:2024cv00336
Filed: January 24, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: Victoria M Calvert
Referring Judge: Catherine M Salinas
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER scheduling Mediation. The parties must appear on Monday, April 8, 2024 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 2008, 20th Floor, United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 75 Ted Turner Drive, S.W., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Prior to the formal mediation, the parties shall: Submit a brief, informal, confidential, ex parte memorandum no later than April 1, 2024, by e-mail directly to christopher_c_bly@gand.uscourts.gov. The memoranda shall not be filed with the Clerk of Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly on 3/7/2024. (dnb)
March 1, 2024 Submission of #12 Order on Motion to Stay to Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (jbu)
February 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #11 Motion to Stay. It is ORDERED that all deadlines and proceedings in this case are stayed pending mediation. If the mediation is unsuccessful, the Parties will propose a new deadline for Defendant's response to the complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 2/29/2024. (jbu)
February 29, 2024 CASE REFERRED to Settlement Judge Magistrate Judge Christopher C. Bly. (jbu)
February 29, 2024 Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Stay (and for Referral to Magistrate Judge for Mediation) with Brief In Support by Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pope, Benson) Modified on 3/1/2024 - removed duplicate text (jbu). Modified on 3/1/2024 (jbu).
February 29, 2024 Filing 10 Certificate of Interested Persons by Mark Chaney. (Stephens, Jeremy)
February 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a certificate of interested persons no later than 3/4/2024. Failure to file a certificate of interested persons by the stated deadline may result in a recommendation that sanctions be imposed, including dismissal of the case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 2/29/2024. (jbu)
February 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER re #7 Joint Stipulation to Substitute Proper Defendant. The Court hereby orders that Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLC is substituted for defendant Cox Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Cox Automotive. Signed by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 2/9/2024. (dnb)
February 9, 2024 Filing 7 STIPULATION re #2 Electronic Summons Issued Joint Stipulation to Substitute Proper Defendant by Mark Chaney. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stephens, Jeremy)
February 8, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER (by docket entry only) GRANTING #5 unopposed motion for extension of time. Defendant Cox Enterprises, Inc. shall have through and including March 7, 2024, to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Catherine M. Salinas on 02/08/2024. (nlj)
February 8, 2024 Filing 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint with Brief In Support by Cox Enterprises, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Pope, Benson)
February 8, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Dominique Saint-Fort on behalf of Cox Enterprises, Inc. (Saint-Fort, Dominique)
January 26, 2024 Filing 3 Letter from Clerk re: LR 83.1 Pro Hac Vice requirements sent to Marc R. Edelman. Clerk to follow-up by 2/5/2024. (djs)
January 24, 2024 Filing 2 Electronic Summons Issued as to Cox Enterprises, Inc. (dnb)
January 24, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Mark Chaney. (Filing fee $405, receipt number AGANDC-13177369) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dnb) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chaney v. Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Chaney
Represented By: Jeremy Stephens
Represented By: Marc R. Edelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cox Enterprises, Inc. doing business as Cox Automotive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLC
Represented By: Benson Edward Pope
Represented By: Dominique Saint-Fort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?