Lai et al v. Jaddou
Thuong Thi Thanh Lai, Huyen Ngoc Vu, Hung Phuc Vu and Tran Ngoc Bao Vu |
Ur Mendoza Jaddou |
1:2024cv00381 |
January 26, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia |
Sarah E Geraghty |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER REGARDING CIVIL LITIGATION. Signed by Judge Sarah E. Geraghty on 2/2/2024. (sap) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou. (tas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus Relief filed by Thuong Thi Thanh Lai, Huyen Ngoc Vu, Tran Ngoc Bao Vu, Hung Phuc Vu. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AGANDC-13182565) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: I-526 Immigration Petition by Alien Entrepreneur Approval Notice, #2 Exhibit B: Plaintiffs Conditional Lawful Permanent Resident Cards, #3 Exhibit C: Receipt Notices for Plaintiffs Form I-829 Petitions, #4 Exhibit D: Historical Average Case Processing Times 2013-2023, #5 Exhibit E: USCIS.gov Case Current Processing Times Report for form I-829, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(tas) Please visit our website at http://www.gand.uscourts.gov/commonly-used-forms to obtain Pretrial Instructions and Pretrial Associated Forms which includes the Consent To Proceed Before U.S. Magistrate form. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.